. 2021 Feb 9;2(2):285–290. doi: 10.1002/jha2.169
Shinya Hagiwara
1, Shigeru Kusumoto
1,✉, Asahi Ito
1, Ayako Masaki
2, Kazuhide Shiraga
1, Takuto Tachita
1,3, Kentaro Hirade
1, Kana Oiwa
1, Tomotaka Suzuki
1, Shiori Kinoshita
1, Masaki Ri
1, Yasuhiko Ito
4,5, Hirokazu Komatsu
1, Hiroshi Inagaki
2, Shinsuke Iida
1
PMCID: PMC9175994PMID: 35845276
Abstract
A 15‐year‐old male was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with t(6;9)(p23;q34), a chimeric DEK‐NUP214 fusion gene. He underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo‐BMT) from an unrelated volunteer donor at first molecular remission. Approximately 5 years after allo‐BMT, multiple bone marrow aspirations showed increased blasts to 63%, which were positive for myeloperoxidase, CD13, CD33, CD56, and CD34. Surprisingly, t(8;21)(q22;q22.1), a chimeric RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 (not DEK‐NUP214) fusion gene, was detected with full donor chimerism. To our best knowledge, this is the first case of a volunteer unrelated donor cell‐derived acute myeloid leukemia harboring a chimeric RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 fusion gene.
Keywords: allogeneic transplantation, donor cell‐derived leukemia, volunteer unrelated donor
Abbreviations
- allo‐BMT
allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
- AML
acute myeloid leukemia
- CR
complete remission
- DCL
donor cell‐derived leukemia
- GVHD
graft‐versus‐host‐disease
- STR
short tandem repeat
- TAC
tacrolimus
1. INTRODUCTION
Donor cell‐derived leukemia (DCL), defined as the development of leukemia from donor cells after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT), is extremely rare [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; limited evidence exists on the etiology of DCL, associated genetic aberrations, risk factors for its development, and prognosis. A standard treatment for DCL has not been established as yet. Herein, we report a case of RUNX1‐RUNX1T1‐positive DCL that developed after unrelated allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for DEK‐NUP214‐positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
2. CASE
A 15‐year‐old male was diagnosed with AML with t(6;9)(p23;q34.1), a chimeric DEK‐NUP214 fusion gene with an FLT3‐ITD mutation, in the pediatric department of our hospital in July 20XX‐5. From August 20XX‐5, systemic chemotherapy was started according to a pediatric protocol for AML (JPLSG‐AML05) and he subsequently achieved the first complete remission (CR). However, his leukemia was judged to be high risk for relapse, and the patient was referred to our department in order to receive allo‐HSCT. In March 20XX‐4, he underwent an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo‐BMT) from a volunteer unrelated, fully matched (eight of eight loci) male donor at the first molecular CR. The conditioning regimen included intravenous busulfan (12.8mg/kg total dose) and cyclophosphamide (120mg/kg total dose). Prophylaxis for graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) included tacrolimus (TAC, 0.03mg/kg initial dose) and short‐term methotrexate. He did not have any sign of acute GVHD, but experienced chronic mild GVHD of the skin that was controlled with topical steroids. TAC was discontinued on day 165 after allo‐BMT. Thereafter, the maintenance of molecular CR was confirmed by bone marrow specimens, using DEK‐NUP214 chimeric gene testing (PCR), for 2 years following allo‐BMT. Of note, chimerism analysis using a short tandem repeat (STR) method on bone marrow specimens, carried out annually after allo‐BMT, indicated maintenance of the donor type (Figure1).
FIGURE 1.
Open in a new tab
During a routine examination in August 20XX (about 4.5 years after allo‐BMT), however, blasts were suddenly observed on a peripheral blood smear, with a white blood cell (WBC) count of 3200/μl (blasts, 5.0%), hemoglobin level of 14.2g/dl, and platelet count of 152,000/μl, and a detailed examination was subsequently initiated accordingly (Table1). Multiple bone marrow aspirations showed increased blasts of up to 63%, which were positive for myeloperoxidase, CD13, CD33, CD56, and CD34. Surprisingly, chromosome banding analysis showed 46, XY, t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) [12/20], and chimeric mRNA gene analysis showed the fusion of RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 in bone marrow samples. However, DEK‐NUP214 and FLT3‐ITD, which had been present at the time of the diagnosis of leukemia, were not detected. Finally, volunteer unrelated DCL was definitively diagnosed by multiple chimerism analysis using not only whole bone marrow samples, but also CD34‐positive cells which were selected by immunomagnetic beads.
TABLE 1.
Laboratory findings at diagnosis in a patient with donor cell‐derived acute myeloid leukemia harboring a chimeric RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 fusion gene
Complete blood count | Biochemistry | Serology | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBC | 3200/μl | TP | 6.8g/dl | CRP | 0.04mg/dl | |
Blast | 5% | Alb | 4.9g/dl | IgG | 639mg/dl | |
Neutro | 44% | AST | 13U/L | IgA | 112mg/dl | |
Mono | 5% | ALT | 12U/L | IgM | 62mg/dl | |
Lym | 45% | LDH | 126U/L | |||
RBC | 453 × 10⁴/μl | γ‐GTP | 16U/L | Bone marrow | ||
Hb | 14.2g/dl | ALP | 186U/L | Blast | 7.2% | |
Ht | 41.8% | Cr | 0.62mg/dl | FCM | CD13+, CD33+, MPO+, HLA‐DR+ | |
MCV | 92.2 fl | UA | 5.0mg/dl | |||
Ret | 8‰ | BUN | 9.6mg/dl | Karyotype | t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) | |
Plt | 15.2 × 10⁴/μl | Glc | 97mg/dl | RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 | Detected | |
Na | 139mmol/L | DEK‐NUP214 | Not detected | |||
Coagulation tests | K | 4.0mmol/L | FLT3‐ITD/TKD mutation | Not detected | ||
PT‐INR | 0.96 | Cl | 102mmol/L | |||
APTT | 106.6% | Ca | 9.8mg/dl | Chimerism | Whole | Donor type |
Fib | 275mg/dl | T.Bil | 1.2mg/d | CD34 sorting | Donor type |
Open in a new tab
Although the patient was diagnosed as having DCL, he was asymptomatic with a small number of blasts and did not wish to receive salvage chemotherapy (Figure1). Therefore, he was followed up by bone marrow examination on an outpatient basis. The patient was admitted to our hospital with a cough, sputum, and fever in December 20XX. Blood tests showed a WBC count of 8300/μl (neutrophils, 62%; blasts, 15%) and a C‐reactive protein level of 19.4mg/dl. Computed tomography revealed small diffuse infiltrates in both lungs, and infiltrates in the right inferior lobe as well as enhanced bronchial shadows. The patient was hospitalized for treatment of pneumonia. The pneumonia improved after antimicrobial therapy, but blasts increased in both peripheral blood and bone marrow. Therefore, remission induction therapy for DCL (idarubicin 12mg/m2 on days 1–3 and cytarabine 100mg/m2 on days 1–7) was started from January 11, 20XX+1. The patient developed bacteremia due to Escherichia coli during the period of bone marrow suppression, which improved with antimicrobial therapy. From February 21, 20XX+1, high‐dose cytarabine therapy (cytarabine 2g/m2 twice daily on days 1–5) was started as a consolidation setting. Febrile neutropenia occurred, but improved after antibacterial and antifungal treatments. From March 26, 20XX+1, a second course of high‐dose cytarabine therapy was started at the same dosage as the first course. The patient developed febrile neutropenia, followed by severe pneumonia and hemophagocytic syndrome, with noninvasive positive‐pressure ventilation required in the intensive care unit. Consolidation therapy was terminated with the second course due to severe infection. The patient achieved and retained molecular CR on a RUNX1–RUNX1T1 chimeric gene analysis in December 20XX+1.
3. DISCUSSION
The concept of DCL was first proposed in 1971 when Fialkow etal. reported a case that developed between relatives following allo‐BMT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [1]. Few reports exist on the incidence of DCL in large‐scale studies. However, of the 46,051 allogeneic transplants registered with the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), only 38 were DCL cases (approximately 80.5 in 100,000 patients) [5]. In Japan, 40 out 36,870 allogeneic transplants were DCL cases (approximately 108.5 in 100,000 patients) according to the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [3]. Thus, although DCL is an extremely rare disease, its concept has become widely known. Nonetheless, no definitive evidence is available regarding the etiology, prognosis, and treatment of DCL due to the limited number of cases and abundance of background factors potentially involved in the pathogenesis.
DCL is diagnosed by G‐banding and cross‐sex fluorescence in situ hybridization for heterosexual transplants, but problems exist that are associated with age‐related Y chromosome defects and X chromosome polyploidy as an underlying condition. For homosexual transplants, chimerism can be analyzed by PCR amplification of STRs.
In our case, a definitive diagnosis of DCL was made approximately 5 years after allo‐BMT from an unrelated volunteer donor. The DEK‐NUP214 chimeric gene and FLT3‐ITD mutation, which had been present when AML was first diagnosed, were not detected when DCL was diagnosed. Of note, the RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 chimeric gene, which had not been present, was detected. Importantly, our patient underwent a periodic bone marrow examination on an annual basis after the allo‐BMT, with the RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 chimeric gene, as well as the DEK‐NUP214 chimeric gene, followed up for 2 years after allo‐BMT (Figure1). Posttransplant chimerism STR analysis indicated maintenance of the donor type (Figure1). Furthermore, chimerism STR analysis, performed on specimens obtained by sorting bone marrow cells with CD34, indicated the donor type (Table1).
The clinical characteristics and outcome of the five patients including our case with DCL harboring RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 are summarized in Table2 [6, 7, 8, 9]. The disease occurred at a relatively young age in all five cases. The median time from transplantation to the onset of DCL was 34 months (range: 15–132 months). Only one patient underwent a second transplantation, and all patients showed DCL of a related donor origin except for this case. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a volunteer unrelated donor cell‐derived AML harboring a chimeric RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 fusion gene.
TABLE 2.
Summary of five patients with donor cell‐derived acute myeloid leukemia harboring a chimeric RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 fusion gene
Case | Original disease | Age/sex (R) | Age/sex (D) | Donor sources | Conditioning | DCL type | Time from first HSCT to DCL (months) | Cytogenetic (G‐banding) analysis | Second HSCT | Outcome | Follow‐up period (months) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AML | 22/M | NA/F | rBM | CY | AML | 34 | 45,X, t(8;21) | Yes | Alive, CR | 17 | [6] |
2 | CML | 29/M | NA/F | rBM | CY | AML | 132 | 45,X, t(8;21) | No | Death | 1 | [7] |
3 | ALL | 24/F | NA/M | rBM | TBI, TLI, CY, ETP, MEL, AraC | AML | 15 | 46,XY, t(8;21) | No | Death | NA | [8] |
4 | SAA | 25/M | 28/M | rPBSC | CY, ATG | AML | 30 | 46,XY, t(8;21),+8 | No | Alive, CR | 36 | [9] |
5 | AML | 15/M | NA/M | uBM | BU+CY | AML | 53 | 46,XY, t(8;21) | No | Alive, CR | 12 | This case |
Open in a new tab
Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; AraC, cytarabine; ATG, anti‐thymocyte globulin; BU, busulfan; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; CY, cyclophosphamide; D, donor; DCL, donor cell leukemia; ETP, etoposide; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; MEL, melphalan; NA, not available; TLI, total lymphoid irradiation; Ref., reference; rBM, related bone marrow; R, recipient; rPBSC, related peripheral blood stem cell; SAA, severe aplastic anemia; TBI, total body irradiation; uBM, unrelated bone marrow.
The clinical characteristics and outcome of the seven patients including our case with DCL derived from unrelated volunteer donors are also summarized in Table3 [8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. The median ages of recipients were 34 years (range: 15–42). Bone marrow and peripheral blood were used as the donor source in four and two cases, respectively, while the donor source was unknown in the remaining one case. The median time from transplantation to the onset of DCL was 27 months (range: 5–193), with the second transplantation being carried out in only one of five cases for which the relevant information was available. With a median follow‐up of 10 months (range: 1–30), two of the seven patients died.
TABLE 3.
Summary of seven patients with unrelated volunteer donor cell‐derived acute myeloid leukemia
Case | Original disease | Age/sex (R) | Age/sex (D) | Donor source | Conditioning | DCL type | Time from first HSCT to DCL (months) | Cytogenetic (G‐banding) analysis | Second HSCT | Outcome | Follow‐up period (months) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CML‐CP | 35/M | NA/M | uBM | BU, CY, TT | AML | 39 | 46,XY t(15;17) | No | Alive | 30 | [8] |
2 | CML‐CP | 40/M | NA/M | uBM | BU, CY, ATG | AML | 14 | 46,XY | Yes | Alive | 9 | [10] |
3 | M. Sar | 34/F | 37/M | uBM | CY, TBI, ALZ | AML | 27 | 45,XY,‐7 | No | Dead | 5 | [11] |
4 | CML‐CP | 42/M | NA/F | uPB | MA | AML | 193 | 46,XX | No | Alive | 1 | [12] |
5 | NA | 20/M | NA/M | u‐NA | CY, TBI | AML | 5 | NA | NA | NA | NA | [13] |
6 | ALL | 28/F | 33/M | uPB | BU, CY, AraC, Semustine, ATG | AML | 20 | 46,XY | NA | Dead | 11 | [14] |
7 | AML | 15/M | NA/M | uBM | BU+CY | AML | 53 | 46,XY, t(8;21) | No | Alive, CR | 12 | This case |
Open in a new tab
Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; ALZ, alemtuzumab; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; AraC, cytarabine; ATG, anti‐thymocyte globulin; BU, buslfan; CML‐CP, chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic phase; CR, complete remission; CY, cyclophosphamide; D, donor; DCL, donor cell leukemia; F, female; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; M, male; MA, myeloablative; M. Sar, myeloid sarcoma; NA, not available; R, recipient; Ref., reference; uBM, unrelated bone marrow; TBI, total body irradiation; TT, thiotepa; uPB, unrelated peripheral blood stem cell.
According to an EBMT report, the prognosis of DCL is poor, with 29 of 38 patients dying at a median of 11 months (range: 0–91 months) following a DCL diagnosis [5]. Of the 38 patients, 18 underwent a second transplantation. The cause of death was DCL in 12 patients, while 10 cases were transplantation‐related deaths. The high incidence of death from DCL progression warrants the consideration of allo‐HSCT, but a consensus on this has not yet been reached. Our patient developed AML harboring a chimeric RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 fusion gene approximately 5 years after allo‐BMT. In general, RUNX1‐RUNX1T1‐positive AML is a core‐binding factor AML for which high‐dose cytarabine is effective as consolidation therapy [15], but the usefulness of allo‐HSCT in first CR has not been demonstrated. Accordingly, high‐dose cytarabine therapy was given after induction therapy, and a second transplantation was not performed in the present case. Nevertheless, since the prognosis of DCL has been shown to be relatively poor, as described above, it is necessary to further accumulate clinical characteristics and outcome regarding DCL to make treatment decisions appropriately.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Shinsuke Iida received grants and personal fees from Celgene, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Ono, grants and personal fees from Takeda, grants and personal fees from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, grants from Chugai, grants from Kyowa Kirin, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work.
Hagiwara S, Kusumoto S, Ito A, etal. Volunteer unrelated donor cell‐derived acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1‐RUNX1T1. eJHaem. 2021;2:285–290. 10.1002/jha2.169
REFERENCES
- 1.Fialkow PJ, Thomas ED, Bryant JI, Neiman PE. Leukaemic transformation of engrafted human marrow cells in vivo. Lancet. 1971;1:251–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wiseman DH. Donor cell leukemia: A review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:771–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kato M, Yamashita T, Suzuki R, Matsumoto K, Nishimori H, Takahashi S, etal. Donor cell‐derived hematological malignancy: A survey by the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Leukemia. 2016;30:1742–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Suarez‐Gonzalez J, Martinez‐Laperche C, Kwon M, Balsalobre P, Carbonell D, Chicano M, etal. Donor cell‐derived hematologic neoplasms after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:1505–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Engel N, Rovo A, Badoglio M, Labopin M, Basak GW, Beguin Y, etal. European experience and risk factor analysis of donor cell‐derived leukaemias/MDS following haematopoietic cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2019;33:508–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Elfenbein GJ, Brogaonkar DS, Bias WB, Burns WH, Saral R, Sensenbrenner LL, etal. Cytogenetic evidence for recurrence of acute myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in donor hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1978;52:627–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cooley LD, Sears DA, Udden MM, Harrison WR, Baker KR. Donor cell leukemia: Report of a case occurring 11 years after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and review of the literature. Am J Hematol. 2000;63:46–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hertenstein B, Hambach L, Bacigalupo A, Schmitz N, McCann S, Slavin S, etal. Development of leukemia in donor cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation–A survey of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Haematologica. 2005;90:969–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma H, Liu T. Development of donor cell leukemia following peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anemia: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2016;11:3858–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hambach L, Eder M, Dammann E, Battmer K, Stucki A, Heil G, etal. Donor cell‐derived acute myeloid leukemia developing 14 months after matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28:705–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wiseman DH, Das M, Poulton K, Liakopoulou E. Donor cell leukemia following unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for primary granulocytic sarcoma of the small intestine. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:315–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang E, Hutchinson CB, Huang Q, Lu CM, Crow J, Wang FF, etal. Donor cell‐derived leukemias/myelodysplastic neoplasms in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A clinicopathologic study of 10 cases and a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135:525–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Washburn K, Selby GB, Dunn ST, Chakrabarty JLH. Donor‐cell leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A retrospective review of a Single Center's Experience. Blood. 2011;118:abstract 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu Z, Liu H, Shi M, Ahmed HAW, Huo L, Zhang Y, etal. Donor HSCs with a preexisting ASXL1‐mutation led to the development of FLT3‐ITD positive AML in the donor and FLT3‐ITD negative AML in the recipient after unrelated transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53:499–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Miyawaki S, Ohtake S, Fujisawa S, Kiyoi H, Shinagawa K, Usui N, etal. A randomized comparison of 4 courses of standard‐dose multiagent chemotherapy versus 3 courses of high‐dose cytarabine alone in postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults: The JALSG AML201 Study. Blood2011;117:2366–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]